Every few years, someone announces the end of television advertising.
And every few years, Direct Response TV quietly keeps delivering results.
Instead of repeating the same talking points, this article does something different. It connects the dots — and points you directly to the original research, industry analysis, and expert breakdowns that explain why DRTV continues to work when executed correctly.
If you’re serious about performance marketing, these are worth your time.
Direct Response TV: The Original Performance Channel
Direct Response Television was built on a simple idea: advertising should create an immediate, measurable response. That concept existed long before digital dashboards and attribution models.
If you want a foundational overview of how DRTV works, how it differs from brand advertising, and why it has endured for decades, the Wikipedia overview of Direct Response Television is a surprisingly solid starting point. It lays out the mechanics, history, and evolution of the channel in a neutral, reference-style format.
This article provides helpful context for marketers who may only associate TV with awareness — not accountability.
Why Measurability Keeps DRTV Relevant
One of the strongest arguments for Direct Response TV today is measurability — and Experian does an excellent job explaining this from a modern marketer’s perspective.
Experian’s breakdown walks through how DRTV integrates with data, analytics, and customer journeys, making it far more accountable than many marketers assume. It explains how phone calls, web visits, and conversions can be attributed back to specific TV placements and creative executions. Click here to read Experian’s analysis on DRTV performance.
If you’re evaluating channels based on ROI, not hype, this article is worth reading end to end.
Scale Still Matters — and TV Still Delivers It
One of television’s enduring advantages is scale — but scale doesn’t have to mean waste.
Connected TV has changed the equation, and Mountain’s deep dive into the rise of CTV explains why television is no longer an “all or nothing” medium. Their analysis breaks down how performance marketers are using household targeting, programmatic buying, and cross-device tracking to make TV behave more like digital — without losing reach.
This is a great read if you’re trying to reconcile linear TV buying with modern performance expectations.
Real Brands, Real Growth, Real Results
If you’re looking for real-world validation — not theory — SmartBrief’s article on why Direct Response TV still works is one of the better summaries available.
Rather than framing DRTV as nostalgia, the piece shows how modern brands continue to use television to validate offers, accelerate customer acquisition, and support broader digital ecosystems. It’s especially useful for marketers who assume TV only works for “old-school” products.
This is a strong reference piece to share internally with teams debating whether TV still belongs in a performance mix.
Modern DRTV Is Not What You Remember
One of the biggest misconceptions about Direct Response TV is that it hasn’t evolved.
In reality, modern DRTV campaigns are short-form, analytically driven, and tightly integrated with digital channels. They are tested, optimized, and measured continuously — not launched and forgotten.
The articles linked above reinforce a common theme: TV works best when it’s treated like a performance channel, not a vanity channel.
The Takeaway
Direct Response TV still works because it does three things exceptionally well:
- It drives immediate action
- It scales faster than most digital channels
- It forces accountability
If you’re evaluating DRTV, don’t just take our word for it. Read the sources. Study the data. Look at how other marketers are using the channel today.
At Infomercial.com, our role is to help marketers separate what’s outdated from what still drives results — and to point you to the best thinking in the industry along the way.











Leave a Reply